ArticleMovement disorders clinical practice2026
Continuous Apomorphine Infusion in Multiple System Atrophy Real-World Insights From a French Nationwide Retrospective Cohort.
Article in Movement disorders clinical practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContinuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion (CSAI) is effective in Parkinson's disease but has not been evaluated in multiple system atrophy (MSA).
objectiveTo assess the 6-month efficacy and tolerability of CSAI in MSA patients.
methodsFrench multicenter retrospective registry-based analysis of CSAI use in MSA. The primary outcome was the 6-month clinical response using the Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) scale. Secondary outcomes included tolerability, indications, infusion parameters, and treatment course.
resultsFifty patients were included; 94% had MSA-P. All had motor fluctuations and 88% showed a clinically meaningful dopaminergic response. CSAI was initiated for motor symptoms (100%) or pain (54%). At 6 months, most patients improved (36% "much," 54% "minimally"), mainly due to reduced motor fluctuations. Only 8% discontinued CSAI. Tolerability was rated good/excellent in 74%; 20% reported somnolence and/or orthostatic hypotension.
conclusionIn selected MSA patients with partial dopaminergic responsiveness and motor fluctuations, CSAI provided short-term clinical benefit with acceptable tolerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.