Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42002985›Full record

ArticleClinical physiology and functional imaging2026

Safety of [

Morten Bentestuen, Camilla Sylvest, Svend B Jensen, Lara R Soro, Aage Knudsen, Morten Ladekarl, Ole Thorlacius-Ussing, Wolfgang P Fendler, Helle D Zacho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical physiology and functional imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Morten BentestuenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6115-0967
Camilla SylvestDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-8482-9943
Svend B JensenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8575-3703
Lara R SoroDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Aage KnudsenDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Morten LadekarlDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0182-1228
Ole Thorlacius-UssingDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4963-1551
Wolfgang P FendlerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, DKTK and NCT site, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5106-3584
Helle D ZachoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Cancer Research Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9089-288X

Funding

Alfred Benzon FoundationRegion of North Jutland Health Research Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

aimFibroblast activation protein inhibitor (FAPI) has demonstrated promising oncological diagnostic performance. Although no adverse events (AEs) have been previously reported, a formal safety evaluation of FAPI PET/CT is lacking. This study aimed to assess the safety and tolerability of [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT, with a focus on hemodynamic parameters, AEs, and patient-reported discomfort. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants were included from two ongoing prospective diagnostic trials: (1) FAPI PET/CT in ovarian cancer (EU CTIS no. 2023-505938-98-00) and (2) FAPI PET/CT in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer (EU CTIS no. 2023-505916-40-01). A dose of 150-250 MBq [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 was administered, and low-dose, non-contrast CT was performed. Hemodynamic parameters, including systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), were measured at baseline, 1-min post-injection (p.i.), 10 min p.i., and post-scan. Additionally, potential AEs and discomfort were assessed at these timepoints and 1 day p.i., and participants were instructed to report events. AEs were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

resultsThirty participants were included. No patient reported AEs or discomfort attributable to [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-46, and no significant changes in mean systolic or diastolic BP were observed; however, three patients experienced increases in systolic BP classified as AEs. A clinically non-relevant but statistically significant (p < 0.01) decrease in HR (from 77 bpm at baseline to 73 bpm at post-scan) was observed.

conclusion[⁶⁸Ga]Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT is well tolerated with no immediate patient-reported discomfort or clinically relevant hemodynamic AEs. The observed decrease in HR from baseline to post-scan likely reflects prescan nervousness.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsGallium RadioisotopesHemodynamicsOvarian NeoplasmsPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedEndopeptidasesFemaleFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaHeart RateHumansMale68Ga-FAPIEndopeptidasesFibroblast Activation Protein AlphaGallium RadioisotopesQuinolinesRadiopharmaceuticalsSerine Endopeptidasesadverse eventsFAPIfibroblast activation protein inhibitoroncologyPETsafety

Identifiers

PMID42002985
PMCPMC13092788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.