ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026
Development and Psychometric Validation of the Palliative Care Experience Scale (PCES): An Experience-Oriented Assessment Instrument.
Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsAccelerated population aging has driven substantial growth in demand for palliative care services. Such services can effectively enhance the living quality for end-of-life patients through multidimensional interventions. Currently, China lacks a localised experience-oriented quality assessment scale for palliative care, resulting in gaps in service quality supervision. To develop a self-reported measurement for palliative care services, with the foundation in the Senses Framework.
designThis study developed a scale by extracting core contributors of palliative care experiences through 14 patients and 16 families' narratives. To refine and improve the scale, a total of 19 experts were invited to participate in a two-round Delphi expert consultation. Additionally, an empirical research was conducted, with 380 valid samples from two independent cohorts collected to complete the full psychometric testing of the scale.
resultsThe final Palliative Care Experience Scale (PCES) comprises two dimensions: sense of security and belonging, and sense of purpose and significance, with a total of 13 items. The total variance includes 79.26% that is explained by these two factors. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a stable factor structure for the PCES. The scale exhibited good reliability, with a total Cronbach' α of 0.937, McDonald' ω of 0.952, and Spearman-Brown corrected split-half reliability of 0.897. Cronbach's α for both dimensions exceeded 0.88. The scale's SEM was 1.50 and MDC95 was 4.16, offering a validated threshold to identify real changes in patients' palliative care experience.
conclusionThis study developed an assessment scale of palliative care quality based on the Senses Framework, uniquely centred on patient experiences. Validated through robust methodologies, this scale fills a gap in the evaluation of experiential dimensions of palliative care in China, providing a scientific and feasible measurement tool for the continuous improvement of services. IMPACT: This study addresses the critical gap of a culturally adapted, patient experience-centred tool for evaluating palliative care service quality in China. Its core finding is the successful development and full psychometric validation of the 13-item Palliative Care Experience Scale (PCES). This research provides a reliable tool for palliative care clinical practice and academic research to capture patients' care experience, offers clinicians and administrators a practical instrument to identify service gaps and guide quality improvement, and delivers foundational reference data for policymakers to advance patient-centred palliative care development in China. REPORTING
methodWe adhered to the relevant EQUATOR reporting guidelines. The development and validation process followed the COSMIN framework for patient-reported outcome measures. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients receiving palliative care and familes played an integral role in designing and conducting this study. In Phase I, qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with 14 patients and 16 families helped define core thematic constructs and develop the initial item pool, which ensured the scale's content validity were based on their real-life experiences. In Phase III, we recruited a new, independent cohort of participants to complete the psychometric testing of the scale, providing key data for its validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.