ArticleThe New phytologist2026
Evaluation of combined root exudate and rhizosphere microbiota sampling approaches to elucidate plant-soil-microbe interactions.
Article in The New phytologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Secretome Profiling ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Comparative Evaluation of Rhizosphere Metabolites Collection Methods: Impacts on Metabolic Diversity, Composition and Pathways.Plant, cell & environment · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deciphering the root exudate-driven interplay between plants and the rhizosphere microbiota is essential for understanding plant adaptation to the environment and future-proofing crop production. However, sampling root exudates and rhizosphere soil remains challenging due to the low throughput and destructive nature of the process. We used the staple crop barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) as a model to benchmark different sampling approaches for simultaneous exudation and microbiota profiling of soil-grown plants. Exudate profiles and total dissolved organic carbon exudation rates were consistent across different sampling approaches, whereas root biomass, root morphology measurements, and organic nitrogen exudation varied. High-throughput amplicon sequencing and quantitative PCR (qPCR) of phylogenetic markers and nitrogen cycle-selected genes revealed a protocol-specific footprint in the composition and abundance of rhizosphere bacterial and fungal microbiota. Yet, on average, 75% of microbes enriched in and differentiating between barley rhizosphere and unplanted soil controls were recovered across all the sampling approaches evaluated. Our results demonstrated that, under the tested conditions, different sampling approaches produced comparable microbiota and exudation patterns, enabling the integrated study of root exudation and microbial profiles from the same plant. The observed differences across sampling approaches must be considered according to the experimental scope.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.