ArticleBMC primary care2026
Use of benzodiazepines, Z-drugs and SSRIs during wartime in Israel - a national cohort study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundArmed conflict can lead to increased stress, anxiety, and other psychological conditions. Benzodiazepines (BZDs), Z-drugs, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are used for stress-related conditions and sleep disturbances. This study aimed to identify the demographic and geographic predictors of BZD, Z-drug, and SSRI use during the first year of the 2023 Israel- Hamas war in Israel, while comparing these patterns to pre-war utilization trends.
methodsUsing data of 557,830 adults from the Meuhedet health maintenance organization, we compared the use of BZDs, Z-drugs, and SSRIs before and during the war, and between individuals residing near and away from combat areas. The analysis included two years of pre-war purchasing records and the first year of the war.
resultsDuring the year before the war, 78,307 individuals were identified as SSRI and/or BZD users, while 479,523 were non-users. Women predominated among medication users, who were generally older and had higher rates of psychiatric diagnoses compared to non-users. Previous use of SSRIs and BZDs was associated with a higher likelihood of wartime use (OR = 333.20, CI 320.74-346.21for SSRIs, OR = 140.44, CI 135.49–145.60 for BZDs). Women were also more likely to use these medications (OR = 1.30, CI 1.27–1.33 for SSRIs, and OR = 1.20, CI 1.18–1.25 for BZDs). Individuals living near combat areas were more likely to use BZDs (OR = 1.33, CI 1.25–1.42) and SSRIs (1.17, CI 1.09–1.27). The general population had a higher OR for the study medications compared to Arabs and Orthodox Jews.
conclusionsPrior use was the strongest factor predicting wartime BZD and SSRI use. Female sex, non-Orthodox Jewish identity, and residing near combat areas were also associated with increased use. These findings emphasize the need for proactive mental health interventions for at-risk groups during times of armed conflicts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.