ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026
Emergency critical care: a blind spot in the upstream phase of critical illness.
Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Critical care delivery models in emergency departments: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of related outcome effects.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAn increasing proportion of critically ill patients receive prolonged, high-acuity care in the emergency department (ED) before admission to the intensive care unit. Despite its clinical relevance, this early phase of care remains poorly characterized and difficult to capture using existing metrics. MAIN BODY: This Perspective argues that this early phase of critical illness represents a distinct but underrecognized component of the critical care continuum, commonly referred to as emergency critical care (ECC). Rather than being defined by location or specialty, ECC is characterized by time-critical decision-making, dynamic trajectory, and evolving care demands. A major challenge in studying this phase is its limited measurability within current frameworks. We therefore propose a pragmatic conceptualization of ECC based on three complementary dimensions: disease severity, clinical care intensity, and therapeutic organ support. Together, these dimensions describe key aspects of early critical illness and provide a pragmatic basis for translating ECC dimensions into observable clinical and administrative variables suitable for research, governance, and system evaluation without imposing rigid definitions or thresholds.
conclusionConceptualizing ECC along clinically meaningful and observable dimensions offers a practical way to improve its visibility in research and system evaluation. Recognizing ECC as a spectrum of critical care delivery rather than a binary state may provide a pragmatic basis for describing and studying early critical illness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.