ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2026
Evaluation of awareness, perceptions, and compliance with infection prevention and control protocols among healthcare professionals at a tertiary hospital in Nasarawa State, Nigeria.
Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare associated infections (HAIs) remain a critical threat to patient safety, particularly in low and middle income countries where infection prevention and control (IPC) systems are inconsistently implemented. Strengthening healthcare workers (HCWs) adherence to IPC protocols is vital to curbing nosocomial transmission and improving healthcare quality in Nigeria.
methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 500 HCWs at the Federal Medical Centre, Keffi, Nasarawa State. Participants were selected through stratified random sampling across five professional cadres. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire and a World Health Organization (WHO)-adapted observational checklist. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including ANOVA and multiple regression, to determine predictors of IPC compliance.
resultsOverall IPC knowledge among HCWs was high (mean = 40.01 ± 3.66; 82%), while adherence to standard IPC practices was moderate (mean = 36.39 ± 5.92; 74%). No statistically significant difference in knowledge was observed across professional categories (p = 0.092), but adherence differed significantly (p < 0.001), with nurses demonstrating the highest compliance. Regression analysis identified institutional support (β = 0.40, p < 0.001) and availability of IPC resources as major predictors of adherence. Barriers included inadequate personal protective equipment (PPE), limited supervision, and high workload.
conclusionAlthough knowledge of IPC was satisfactory, adherence to standard practices among HCWs at FMC Keffi remains suboptimal due to systemic and institutional challenges rather than knowledge deficits. Strengthening leadership commitment, ensuring sustainable PPE supply chains, implementing continuous professional training, and reinforcing monitoring mechanisms are essential to enhance IPC compliance and reduce HAIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.