ArticleCardiovascular ultrasound2026
Surgical aortic valve replacement in severe left ventricular dysfunction: mortality, echocardiographic, and strain outcomes.
Article in Cardiovascular ultrasound, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction (ejection fraction [EF] ≤ 35%) undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) are considered high-risk patients. This study evaluated contemporary outcomes in such patients undergoing SAVR for severe aortic stenosis (AS) or aortic regurgitation (AR) and identified clinical and echocardiographic predictors of mortality.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included 84 patients (> 18 years) with EF ≤ 35% who underwent SAVR between 2015 and 2024. The cohort comprised 53 patients with AS and 31 with AR. Clinical, echocardiographic, and myocardial strain data were collected before and 6 months after SAVR. Mortality data were obtained from national registries, with follow-up through March 2025. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify mortality predictors.
resultsMedian EF was 28% in AS and 31.1% in AR. Patients with AR were significantly younger than AS (44 vs. 63 years, p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality for AS was 9.4%, increasing to 13.2% at 1 year and 43.4% at 55 months. AR patients showed no in-hospital deaths and 32.3% mortality at 55 months. Eight-year survival was 38.7% in patients with AS and 43.1% in patients with AR. In AS, creatinine (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.01, p = 0.022) and preoperative peak velocity (HR = 0.52, p = 0.020) predicted mortality. In AR, only length of hospital stays (HR = 1.13, p = 0.017) was predictive.
conclusionSAVR in severe LV dysfunction offers better medium-term survival, with clinical factors guiding prognosis.
trial registrationInstitut Jantung Negara Ethics Committee (IJNREC/779/2025).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.