ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Revisiting the Concept of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy: A Proof-of-Concept Prospective Study From a Cervical Cancer Cohort.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNerve-sparing radical hysterectomy aims to preserve the autonomic innervation of pelvic organs. In most studies, the preservation of the parasympathetic component of pelvic innervation is achieved by sparing the lymphovascular-neural tissue located at the base of the lateral paracervical tissue. This study explores an alternative surgical technique based on a different anatomical pathway of parasympathetic fibers, running more cranially and deeply within the pararectal space.
methodsThis was a prospective proof-of-concept cohort study in six patients with stage IB2-IIA cervical cancer undergoing nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM). A multimodal IONM protocol was employed, including electrical stimulation, triggered electromyography, and cystometry, to identify and assess key parasympathetic nerve pathways.
resultsThe newly identified alternative pathway of putative parasympathetic fibers was consistently observed intraoperatively in this small cohort. Real-time neurophysiological monitoring suggested that these fibers may contribute to parasympathetic control of bladder and rectal function. Notably, preserving these fibers did not require complex dissection. All patients maintained normal pelvic organ function with no perioperative complications or postoperative dysfunction.
conclusionsThis pilot study provides evidence that the putative parasympathetic fibers essential for bladder and rectal function run cranially within the pararectal space, rather than through the posterolateral paracervical tissue. Optimizing neurophysiological parameters for IONM and selectively preserving the deeper fiber pathway may offer a safer and more effective approach to nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy. Our data would be useful in informing future larger comparative trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42002718What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.