Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42002682›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

Social determinants of health screening and interventions in neonatal care pathways (NICU to follow-up): a scoping review.

Behrouz Nezafat Maldonado, Katie Evans, Martha Jones, Jessica Park, Elaine Wood, Hammad Khan, Paul Cawley

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Behrouz Nezafat MaldonadoNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina Children's Hospital London, St Thomas' Hospital, 6th Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK. bnezafat@ic.ac.uk.
Katie EvansNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina Children's Hospital London, St Thomas' Hospital, 6th Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Martha JonesNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina Children's Hospital London, St Thomas' Hospital, 6th Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Jessica ParkNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina Children's Hospital London, St Thomas' Hospital, 6th Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Elaine WoodNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina Children's Hospital London, St Thomas' Hospital, 6th Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Hammad KhanNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina Children's Hospital London, St Thomas' Hospital, 6th Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.
Paul CawleyNeonatal Intensive Care Unit, Evelina Children's Hospital London, St Thomas' Hospital, 6th Floor North Wing, Westminster Bridge Road, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social determinants of health (SDOH) influence families' ability to engage with neonatal care and may contribute to inequities in outcomes. Whilst the neonatal period presents a unique opportunity to address SDOH, it is unclear how screening and related responses are implemented across the neonatal care pathway. This review aimed to (i)o map and characterise existing screening tools and interventions used in the neonatal period to address SDOH and (ii) identify gaps in effectiveness and equity impacts. We conducted a scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) of studies from high-income countries reporting SDOH screening tools and/or interventions delivered in neonatal inpatient settings, discharge/postnatal pathways, neonatal follow-up services, or early infancy primary care. We report setting, tool content and delivery, downstream actions (referral/navigation), outcomes reported, and whether measurement properties were reported. Eight studies were included (predominantly from the USA/Canada) from 3764 studies screened. Most evidence related to implementation of screening and referral workflows rather than evaluation of downstream clinical outcomes. Screening approaches identified high levels of reported social need and commonly triggered social work involvement and referrals; only one study reported a defined "connection with resources" outcome beyond referral. Two studies evaluated equity-relevant interventions beyond screening: a digital participation intervention to support attendance at family-centred rounds and a follow-up intervention addressing structural barriers through coordinated support. Across included neonatal applications, psychometric properties of instruments were not reported, and tools were commonly adapted from other settings or locally developed. Outcomes were heterogeneous and most frequently process-focused (uptake, referrals), limiting comparability.

conclusionEvidence describing SDOH screening and responses across neonatal care pathways remains limited and largely descriptive. Future work should define a core set of SDOH domains with context-specific modules, use standardised outcome reporting, and apply a minimum reporting set for neonatal SDOH screening/intervention studies. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Studies mainly report screening/referral processes; neonatal-context psychometric evidence and standardised downstream outcomes are lacking. WHAT IS NEW: • We propose a minimum reporting set to improve how future neonatal SDOH screening/intervention studies are reported and evaluated.

Indexed as

Intensive Care Units, NeonatalSocial Determinants of HealthEvidence GapsHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal careNICUSDOH

Identifiers

PMID42002682
PMCPMC13092529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.