ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2026
Social determinants of health screening and interventions in neonatal care pathways (NICU to follow-up): a scoping review.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social determinants of health (SDOH) influence families' ability to engage with neonatal care and may contribute to inequities in outcomes. Whilst the neonatal period presents a unique opportunity to address SDOH, it is unclear how screening and related responses are implemented across the neonatal care pathway. This review aimed to (i)o map and characterise existing screening tools and interventions used in the neonatal period to address SDOH and (ii) identify gaps in effectiveness and equity impacts. We conducted a scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) of studies from high-income countries reporting SDOH screening tools and/or interventions delivered in neonatal inpatient settings, discharge/postnatal pathways, neonatal follow-up services, or early infancy primary care. We report setting, tool content and delivery, downstream actions (referral/navigation), outcomes reported, and whether measurement properties were reported. Eight studies were included (predominantly from the USA/Canada) from 3764 studies screened. Most evidence related to implementation of screening and referral workflows rather than evaluation of downstream clinical outcomes. Screening approaches identified high levels of reported social need and commonly triggered social work involvement and referrals; only one study reported a defined "connection with resources" outcome beyond referral. Two studies evaluated equity-relevant interventions beyond screening: a digital participation intervention to support attendance at family-centred rounds and a follow-up intervention addressing structural barriers through coordinated support. Across included neonatal applications, psychometric properties of instruments were not reported, and tools were commonly adapted from other settings or locally developed. Outcomes were heterogeneous and most frequently process-focused (uptake, referrals), limiting comparability.
conclusionEvidence describing SDOH screening and responses across neonatal care pathways remains limited and largely descriptive. Future work should define a core set of SDOH domains with context-specific modules, use standardised outcome reporting, and apply a minimum reporting set for neonatal SDOH screening/intervention studies. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Studies mainly report screening/referral processes; neonatal-context psychometric evidence and standardised downstream outcomes are lacking. WHAT IS NEW: • We propose a minimum reporting set to improve how future neonatal SDOH screening/intervention studies are reported and evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.