ArticleJournal of plant research2026
Can floral preference of insect visitors be applied to species identification of the Japanese Arisaema (Araceae)?
Article in Journal of plant research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Species specificity in plant–insect interactions can be new diagnostic traits as an objective criterion for species delimitation and identification. To evaluate the taxonomic reliability of floral preference by specialist pollinator species, we used Japanese Arisaema species, which selectively attract different fungus gnat pollinators, as a model system. We comprehensively investigated (1) external morphology, (2) floral visitor assemblage, and (3) population genetic structure of two unidentified Arisaema populations and three candidate Arisaema species (A. aequinoctiale, A. minus, and A. nambae), and compared the performance of species identification between external morphology (conventional method) and floral visitor assemblages (alternative method). First, we selected “correct answer” for species identification of the unidentified populations from the three candidates based on 14 morphological traits, flower visitation frequency of ten major dipteran visitors, and population genetic structure. Then, we compared the identification accuracy among canonical discriminant functions consisting of morphological traits (model M), insect visitation frequency (model I), and both (model M + I). The morphological, floral visitor, and genetic similarities between populations consistently suggested that the unidentified populations belonged to A. minus. The identification accuracy of model I was comparable to that of model M, and the combination of morphological and visitor data (i.e. model M + I) maximized model performance. Although the collection of analyzable datasets of fungus gnat assemblages may impose considerable labor on plant taxonomists, this new taxonomic trait can be an alternative tool for recently diversified species complexes of Japanese Arisaema.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42002667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.