ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Multi-phase and Multi-mode Gait Recognition with Few Channels and Few Features Based on the Fusion of sEMG and Acceleration.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo address sensor redundancy and single-dimension (either phase or pattern) in gait recognition, this study proposes a few-channel multi-information fusion framework to achieve concurrent gait pattern-phase recognition, balancing recognition accuracy, system simplicity, and user comfort.
methodsTen healthy males performed five gait patterns (level walking, stair ascent/descent, ramp ascent/descent). Lower limb surface electromyogram (sEMG), acceleration, and plantar pressure signals were collected. Gait cycles were split into five phases using plantar pressure signals, features were extracted from intra-phase sEMG and acceleration signals, selected via Maximum Relevance Minimum Redundancy (mRMR), and classified by Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for gait recognition.
resultsFirstly, a study of five-class classification of gait phases for one single terrain using sensor data from one single muscle location showed that signals at the medial calf (gastrocnemius) or thigh (rectus femoris) had better classification performance with an average accuracy of 91.58%. Secondly, when the five gait phases from five different terrains were combined into a 25-class classification task, the results of fusing the two-channel signals from the calf and the two-channel signals at the thigh were analyzed separately. With fewer channels and features, the classification accuracy reached 88.5%, covering 25 classes.
conclusionConsidering that lower leg amputations constitute a significant proportion of all major lower limb amputations, we suggest that the fusion of signals from the rectus femoris and semitendinosus positions as the signal sources should be selected for intelligent prosthesis control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42002662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.