Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Effects of Sacubitril/Allisartan versus Olmesartan on serum uric acid in Chinese patients with hypertension and hyperuricaemia.
Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hyperuricaemia is a known cardiovascular risk factor. Several angiotensin receptor blockers, such as losartan, can decrease serum uric acid level, but the effect on serum uric acid of angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor remains unclear. This analysis aimed to investigate the effects of Sacubitril/Allisartan on serum uric acid level in Chinese patients with both hypertension and hyperuricaemia. We performed post-hoc analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial that compared the blood pressure-lowering effect at 12 weeks of treatment with Sacubitril/Allisartan (240 or 480 mg/d) and Olmesartan (20 mg/d). Hyperuricaemia was defined as a serum uric acid concentration exceeding the limit (420 μmol/L in male and 360 μmol/L in female) or patients already on antihyperuricemic drugs. The outcome measures included serum uric acid levels at 12, 24 and 52 weeks of treatment. Of the 1197 randomized patients, 401 (33.5%) patients with both hypertension and hyperuricaemia were included in this analysis. Mean serum uric acid levels at baseline were 441.4 ± 60.3 μmol/L, 430.5 ± 67.1 μmol/L, and 449.9 ± 78.6 μmol/L for the Sacubitril/Allisartan 240 mg, Sacubitril/Allisartan 480 mg, and Olmesartan groups, respectively (P = 0.41). Over the 12-week double-blind treatment period, serum uric acid levels decreased significantly from baseline in both Sacubitril/Allisartan groups compared to Olmesartan (-7.7 μmol/L), with a more pronounced reduction in the 240 mg (-37.7 μmol/L) and 480 mg groups (-43.3 μmol/L). Least square mean changes in serum uric acid reductions were greater with Sacubitril/Allisartan versus Olmesartan, with a difference of -30.0 μmol/L (P = 0.01) for Sacubitril/Allisartan 240 mg and -35.6 μmol/L (P = 0.002) for Sacubitril/Allisartan 480 mg. Treatment with Sacubitril/Allisartan decreased serum uric acid levels significantly more than Olmesartan in Chinese patients with both hypertension and hyperuricaemia, demonstrating a unique uricosuric effect of Sacubitril/Allisartan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42002633What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.