ArticleScientific reports2026
Estimating return on investment of four interventions based on health technology assessment studies in India.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emerging medical technologies hold significant promise for enhancing patient care; however, thorough assessment is necessary before their integration into healthcare systems. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a key tool that helps evaluate the benefits, costs, and impacts of these new health interventions. In India, the government’s Universal Health Coverage (UHC) initiative emphasizes the critical role of HTA in making informed healthcare decisions and optimizing resource utilization. This study used a retrospective evaluation design to analyse four HTA studies conducted in India. We focused on measuring the return on investment (ROI) of these interventions to understand the economic and health impacts of these interventions. The impact of the four health interventions demonstrate substantial economic gains and health benefits, with returns ranging from 8.5 to 3,906 USD per dollar invested. Overall, all four interventions demonstrate effective health outcomes and substantial economic returns relative to their costs. This study emphasizes the crucial role of HTA in guiding healthcare investments and ensuring judicious allocation of resources in India’s plan for Universal Health Coverage. By using systematic evaluations, HTA helps make better use of healthcare resources, leading to a more sustainable and effective healthcare system. Future studies should look at the long-term implementation of decisions made using HTA, especially on health outcomes and cost efficiency, to improve community health and well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.