ArticleScientific reports2026
Acoustic cues into a surgeon-assist physical AI for detecting bone penetration during spinal surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feasibility of Drill-Tip Position Estimation During Cortical Bone Drilling Using Force and Torque Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Skilled surgeons can detect subtle changes in bone-cutting sounds to recognize bone penetration, but acoustic cues are subjective and dependent on surgical experience. The objective of this study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model capable of detecting bone penetration from intraoperative percussion sounds. A total of 1,236 chisel strikes were identified from intraoperative recordings obtained during lumbar and thoracic spinal decompression surgeries performed using a chisel, and were labeled as penetration or non-penetration. Acoustic features were extracted per strike and expanded across 3-hit sliding windows to capture dynamic temporal changes. A gradient boosting machine learning classifier (LightGBM) was trained, and 10% of the data were reserved as an independent test set. Model performance was primarily evaluated using the area under the precision–recall curve (PR-AUC) and receiver operating characteristic AUC (ROC-AUC). On the independent test set, the model yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.838 and a PR-AUC of 0.604. In a sensitivity analysis, the model achieved a sensitivity of 0.828, specificity of 0.767, accuracy 0.784, F1-score 0.686, and precision 0.585. Feature importance analysis revealed that dynamic changes between consecutive strikes, such as mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), zero-crossing rate, and spectral contrast, were the most influential predictors. An AI model analyzing intraoperative percussion sounds demonstrated a robust ability to detect bone penetration, with consistent ROC performance and clinically acceptable PR-AUC. Quantifying acoustic cues traditionally interpreted subjectively by surgeons may support intraoperative decision-making and surgical training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.