ArticleScientific reports2026
Examining the impact of higher-order thinking and GAI chatbots on engineering creativity in higher education.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of higher-order thinking and creativity is widely regarded as a central objective in engineering education. With the increasing use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) tools, particularly AI chatbots, there is growing interest in understanding how these technologies are related to cognitive processes and creative outcomes. This study examines the relationships among higher-order thinking, GAI chatbot use, and engineering creativity, with a particular focus on their underlying dimensions. Data were collected through a self-reported survey administered to engineering students, and the proposed model was analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Importance–performance map analysis (IPMA) and necessary condition analysis (NCA) were also conducted to provide complementary perspectives. The results indicate that higher-order thinking is positively associated with engineering creativity and with reported GAI chatbot use. In contrast, the association between GAI chatbot use and engineering creativity is comparatively weaker, although statistically significant. The IPMA results show that higher-order thinking has higher relative importance within the model, while GAI chatbot use demonstrates moderate performance but lower importance. The NCA findings further suggest that certain dimensions of higher-order thinking may act as constraints at lower levels of creativity. The findings highlight differentiated relationships among cognitive processes, AI tool use, and creativity in engineering education. The study contributes to a more fine-grained understanding of how higher-order thinking and AI tool use are related to different aspects of engineering creativity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.