ArticleScientific reports2026
Data augmentation of event causality identification task with pre-trained language models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Event Causality Identification (ECI) is one of the main tasks in Natural Language Processing (NLP) especially in extracting causal relationships from text. Since identifying causality requires significant time and resources, we applied various data augmentation techniques to enhance data efficiency and the model's classification performance. In this context, preserving causality by maintaining the sentence's structure and context is crucial. Therefore, we propose an augmentation method that leverages the characteristics of Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) that learn context during the masking process. To compare with PLM-based approaches, we employed various augmentation techniques such as Easy Data Augmentation (EDA), part-of-speech (pos) tagging, noise-based methods and Large Language Models (LLMs). We evaluate performance using Efficiently Learning an Encoder that Classifies Token Replacements Accurately (ELECTRA) as the downstream binary classifier whether the sentence involves the causal relationship. To examine the impact of selection strategy, we compared two approaches: cosine similarity-based Top-1 selection and random selection among augmented candidates. The selected sentences were then used to train the ELECTRA classifier. In addition to standard evaluation, we design an imbalanced data scenario to assess the robustness of the proposed method under low-resource conditions. PLMs showed the highest performance and demonstrated their applicability across various environments by maintaining strong performance even in imbalanced scenarios. Through our experiments, we confirmed that PLM-based data augmentation methods achieve meaningful results in the ECI task and demonstrate the importance of preserving context and structure for predicting causality in sentences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.