ArticleScientific reports2026
End-to-end pipeline for automated heart failure diagnosis with clinical notes using SNOMED-CT.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diagnosis of heart failure is complex but crucial for patient outcomes and often hindered by the untapped potential of unstructured clinical notes. We introduce a novel end-to-end pipeline for heart failure diagnosis, leveraging electronic health records (EHR) and German clinical notes from 846 patients. Our pipeline synthesizes abbreviation disambiguation, translation of German clinical notes to English, medical entity linking to SNOMED-CT, and subsequent classification. The classification was performed using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and compared against a fine-tuned medBERT.de neural baseline. We reduced the reliance on training data with zero-shot learning to address limitations with abbreviation disambiguation and entity linking approaches. Validation against benchmark datasets and cardiologists demonstrates high accuracy for real clinical use. Abbreviation disambiguation achieved an accuracy of up to 96.1%. Entity linking achieved competitive performance compared to state-of-the-art approaches on selected evaluation datasets. The SVM classification approach utilizing SNOMED-CT concepts and EHR data achieved an F1-score of 65.3%, on par with the medBERT.de neural baseline using clinical notes and EHR data. Despite challenges regarding limited language-specific resources and reference dataset availability for SNOMED-CT annotations in German, our pipeline demonstrates high potential for real-world clinical use and clinical decision support grounded in the standardized SNOMED-CT ontology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.