ArticleScientific reports2026
Sustainable mixture design of rice husk ash cement based concrete: performance optimization through data driven modeling and multi objective analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review of the Effects of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on the Autogenous Shrinkage of High-Performance Concrete.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rice husk ash (RHA), a silica-rich by-product from rice husk combustion, serves as an eco-friendly partial cement replacement, contributing to reduced greenhouse gas emissions and sustainable construction practices. This study develops a practical predictive optimization framework for Rice Husk Ash Concrete (RHAC) targeting compressive strength (CS) alongside CO2 and SO2 emission reductions. Two ensemble learning strategies, voting and stacking, integrate Histogram Gradient Boosting (HGB) and Light Gradient Boosting (LGB) models, complemented by a Dempster–Shafer-based ensemble for enhanced prediction accuracy. Multi-objective optimization is performed using the Artificial Protozoa Optimizer (APO) and Electric Eel Foraging Optimization (EEFO) to explore trade-offs between mechanical and environmental performance. The Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) supports final decision-making, identifying balanced RHAC mixture designs. The proposed approach delivers high predictive accuracy and effective optimization, offering a robust pathway toward greener and more sustainable concrete production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.