Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42002414›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2026

Virtual Reality for Managing Procedural Pain and Distress in Paediatrics: A Scoping Review.

Xiaoxia Huang, Kaimin Chen, Yuling Zheng, Lilan He, Mingzhu He, Wenli Shen, Chen Wang

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Xiaoxia HuangJinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4296-9840
Kaimin ChenJinan University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9639-2238
Yuling ZhengJinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Lilan HeThe First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Mingzhu HeJinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Wenli ShenJinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Chen WangJinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcedural pain and distress in children can result in severe short- and long-term consequences, including post-traumatic stress syndrome and needle phobia. While distraction techniques (e.g., toys, music) have been widely used, virtual reality (VR) offers a novel, immersive form of distraction. Despite the rapid development of VR technologies, there is a lack of comprehensive evidence regarding which paediatric patients and procedures benefit most from VR interventions.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. A systematic search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Chinese databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, SinoMed) identified studies from January 1, 2000 to November 15, 2025. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-experimental designs assessing VR for pain/anxiety management during medical procedures in paediatric patients, with outcomes including pain intensity, distress, feasibility, satisfaction or safety.

resultsOf the 5458 original database citations, 201 were eligible for full-text evaluation. Of these articles, a total of 22 were included in the scoping review. RCTs comprised 81.8% (n = 18). The majority (86.4%) employed immersive VR and 27.3% utilized cost-effective smartphone-based systems. Procedures targeted included venipuncture, needle-related interventions, intravenous access, surgery and burn wound care. Approximately 86.4% of studies reported VR's superiority over standard care in reducing procedural pain and distress.

conclusionVR is an effective, non-pharmacological tool for managing procedural pain and distress in paediatric clinical settings, showing promise for integration into routine care. However, existing studies exhibit methodological heterogeneity and focus primarily on short-term outcomes. Future research should prioritize large-scale, rigorously designed RCTs with long-term follow-up, and focus on developing standardized, evidence-based VR protocols for diverse paediatric populations. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution was required for this scoping review, as it only synthesized existing published literature without primary data collection.

Indexed as

Pain ManagementPediatricsProcedural PainVirtual RealityChildHumansmedical procedurepaediatricspain managementstressvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID42002414
PMCPMC13353742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.