Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42002301›Full record

GuidelineBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2026

HLA genotype testing for carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and eslicarbazepine: A guideline developed by the UK Centre of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation in Pharmacogenomics (CERSI-PGx).

Lucy Galloway, Cinzia Dello Russo, Nicholas Bass, Elvira Bramon, Helen Cross, Natalie Curley, Sarah Curran, Helen Davies, Jana De Villiers, William Evans and 15 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. UGT1A1 and irinotecan: Ready for routine pharmacogenetic care.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Lucy GallowayNHS South East Genomic Medicine Service, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8396-7855
Cinzia Dello RussoDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2538-3832
Nicholas BassDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Elvira BramonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Helen CrossUniversity College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Natalie CurleyNHS South West London Integrated Care Board, London, UK.
Sarah CurranSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Helen DaviesCwm Taf Morgannwg University Health Board, Abercynon, UK.
Jana De VilliersThe State Hospitals Boards for Scotland, Lanark, UK.
William EvansYorkshire Regional Genetics Service, Leeds, UK.
Bernhard FrankThe Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Alice GrovesUrgent Care Division, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK.
Judith HaywardNational Genomics Education Programme, NHS England, London, UK.
Jon HighamBirmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust and Birmingham Dental Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Dyfrig A HughesCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, North Wales Medical School Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8247-7459
Shwe Sin KyawCentre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, North Wales Medical School Bangor University, Bangor, UK.
Anthony G MarsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Ailsa McLellanRoyal Hospital for Children and Young People, Edinburgh, UK.
Seth MensahCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Francis O'NeillSchool of Dentistry, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Jane SargisonFaculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Sanjay M SisodiyaDepartment of Epilepsy, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Jill SwanNHS Ayrshire and Arran, Ayr, UK.
Joanna M ZakrewskaRoyal National ENT & Eastman Dental Hospitals, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Munir PirmohamedDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-7266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbamazepine is licensed in the United Kingdom for the treatment of epilepsy, bipolar disorder and trigeminal neuralgia. The related compounds oxcarbazepine and eslicarbazepine are licensed for the treatment of epilepsy. These drugs can cause immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions, which typically affect the skin, and can be of variable severity. The liver and other organ systems can also be affected. The HLA alleles, HLA-B*15:02, HLA-B*15:11 and HLA-A*31:01, are known predisposing factors for these hypersensitivity reactions. Any treatment-naïve patient, regardless of ancestry or indication for treatment, who is about to be prescribed carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine or eslicarbazepine, or has been on these drugs for less than 3 months, should undergo pharmacogenetic testing to identify all clinically relevant HLA alleles to reduce the risk of hypersensitivity reactions. Carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine and eslicarbazepine should be avoided in HLA-B*15:02-positive patients. These drugs should also be avoided in patients positive for HLA-A*31:01 or HLA-B*15:11 if an alternative is possible. Where it is not possible to use an alternative, treatment should only be commenced after careful consideration of the benefits and risks, with increased monitoring and advising patients on appropriate action to take if a skin rash occurs. Our guideline is compatible with other international pharmacogenetics prescribing guidelines. This guideline is grounded in the latest evidence but cannot account for all individual factors relevant to patient care. Therefore, prescribers must conduct a thorough assessment of each patient's risk-benefit profile, ensuring that therapy is optimised to maximise benefits whilst minimising potential harms.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsCarbamazepineDibenzazepinesDrug HypersensitivityHLA AntigensOxcarbazepinePharmacogenomic TestingGenotypeHLA-A AntigensHLA-B15 AntigenHLA-B AntigensHumansPharmacogeneticsUnited KingdomAnticonvulsantsCarbamazepineDibenzazepineseslicarbazepineHLA-A AntigensHLA AntigensHLA-B15 AntigenHLA-B AntigensOxcarbazepinecarbamazepineeslicarbazepineHLA‐AHLA‐Bhypersensitivityoxcarbazepinepharmacogenomics

Identifiers

PMID42002301
PMCPMC13304249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.