ArticleJournal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS2026
The Role of Antibody Testing Using Commercially Available Reagents in Tuberculosis Surveillance Algorithms Being Developed for Nonhuman Primate Breeding Colonies.
Article in Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The detection and elimination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex-infected nonhuman primates (NHPs) is vitally important to ensure the biosecurity and health of the individual animals as well as the NHP colonies and humans who have contact with them. In the century since the tuberculin skin test was developed and used for detection, additional tests targeting the organisms or the host response to them have been proposed as alternative or adjunct pieces to build a testing algorithm. None has gained widespread acceptance for use in NHPs. A major obstacle has been the lack of rigorous studies to validate the use of these tests, especially comparisons against isolation via culture, the long accepted but less than perfect and often technically challenging gold standard. The changing biology of infection over time and the lack of availability of statistically powerful numbers of well-characterized samples from known naturally infected subjects have been additional obstacles. Recent studies have examined the use of newer assays such as IFNγ release assays for cell-mediated immune responses and PCR tests for direct agent detection. In this study we explored the use of antibody testing using commercially available reagents: 39 nonnegative skin tests and 16 nonnegative antibody tests were found in 593 animals from 3 large, stable, long-term breeding colonies. Using multiple tests, infection was not confirmed in any of the animals. Thus, antibody testing may be another useful tool for TB surveillance in NHPs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.