ArticleIntestinal research2026
Practices and perceptions of imaging assessment in inflammatory bowel disease: a nationwide survey of physicians in Korea by the KASID Guidelines Taskforce Team.
Article in Intestinal research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimsImaging-based assessment is essential for evaluating disease activity and structural damage in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to evaluate real-world use and perceptions of imaging modalities among Korean IBD experts and to identify implications for future domestic guideline development.
methodsA nationwide, web-based survey was conducted among board-certified gastroenterologists affiliated with the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. The questionnaire assessed respondent characteristics, imaging modality use in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), and perceptions of clinical utility using a 5-point Likert scale. Results were summarized as frequencies and percentages.
resultsOf 150 invited clinicians, 133 responded, with 74.4% practicing in tertiary referral centers. In CD, computed tomography enterography (CTE) and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) were the most used modalities at diagnosis and follow-up. In contrast, IUS utilization was low (6.8% at diagnosis and 10.5% during follow-up), and 82.0% reported no intestinal ultrasound (IUS) use in the preceding year. In UC, CT-based strategies also predominated, and more than half reported no imaging during follow-up. Major barriers to IUS adoption included limited experience, time constraints, and institutional or equipment limitations. CT/CTE and MRE were perceived as useful for diagnosis and complication assessment, whereas IUS was viewed as suitable for repeated monitoring but highly operator dependent.
conclusionsIBD imaging practices in Korea rely predominantly on CT-based modalities, with limited real-world use of MRE and IUS despite their recognized clinical potential. Future Korean guidelines should acknowledge these real-world limitations while encouraging gradual integration of MRE and IUS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.