ArticleJournal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Assessing changes in aortic motion and hemodynamics after valve-sparing aortic root surgery in Marfan syndrome using four-dimensional balanced steady-state free precession and four-dimensional flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAortic root surgery in patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS) has significantly improved survival, allowing time for distal aortic complications such as type B aortic dissection (TBAD) to emerge. The implantation of a non-compliant synthetic graft may alter aortic biomechanics and hemodynamics, potentially contributing to these late complications. This proof-of-concept study aimed to assess changes in aortic motion and flow characteristics following aortic root surgery using advanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) techniques.
methodsThree MFS patients (aged 26-37 years), two males, one female, undergoing valve-sparing aortic root surgery, were prospectively studied before and 6 months after surgery. All participants underwent non-contrast-enhanced four-dimensional (4D) balanced steady-state free precession and 4D flow CMR at 3T. A deep learning-based segmentation pipeline (nnU-Net) provided segmentations utilized for calculation of aortic displacement, distensibility, regional wall shear stress (WSS) and velocity, and global pulse wave velocity (PWV).
resultsPostoperatively, all patients exhibited markedly decreased ascending aorta (AAo) volume. Three-dimensional distensibility (10⁻³ mmHg⁻¹) also decreased: patient 1, from 4.1 to 1.7; patient 2, from 3.4 to 1.2; and patient 3, from 2.9 to 1.5. Displacement in the AAo, especially at the sinotubular junction, was substantially reduced, consistent with the rigidity of the implanted graft. In the descending aorta (DAo), distensibility and displacement showed increases in two patients and a decrease in one. Peak systolic velocity and WSS increased in the AAo for all patients, whereas DAo values remained largely unchanged. PWV change varied between patients: decreasing slightly in patient 1, from 8.4 to 7.9 m/s, but increased in patients 2 and 3 (8.0 to 8.9 m/s and 6.2 to 9.8 m/s, respectively.
conclusionThis study demonstrated that AAo biomechanics and hemodynamics change predictably following valve-sparing aortic root surgery in MFS, while changes in the DAo were not consistent between patients. Further research with larger sample sizes is required to identify which of these changes are linked to specific disease profiles and whether parameter combinations can indicate a predisposition to TBAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.