Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42001901›Full record

ArticleBJU international2026

Deep learning for fluorescence confocal microscopy image interpretation in radical prostatectomy.

Lixiang Fang, Nikhil Mayor, Alexander Light, Anna Silvanto, Aiman Haider, Chase Ng, Archana Gopalakrishnan, Ranil Johann Boaz, Mariana Bertoncelli Tanaka, Bijan Khoubehi and 13 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Lixiang FangDivision of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7445-9760
Nikhil MayorImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2681-2501
Alexander LightImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7246-3651
Anna SilvantoDepartment of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Aiman HaiderDepartment of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Chase NgImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Archana GopalakrishnanImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Ranil Johann BoazDepartment of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, UK.
Mariana Bertoncelli TanakaImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4130-6519
Bijan KhoubehiDepartment of Urology, Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Giles HellawellDepartment of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service (NHS) Trust, London, UK.
Ricardo Almeida-MaganaDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Larissa MendesDepartment of Pathology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Eoin DinneenDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Greg ShawDepartment of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ben ChallacombeDepartment of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Paul CathcartDepartment of Urology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Martin J ConnorImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Taimur T ShahImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1642-1208
Hashim U AhmedImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1674-6723
Francesca FiorentinoNightingale-Saunders Clinical Trials and Epidemiology Unit, King's Clinical Trials Unit and Division of Methodology, King's College London, London, UK.
Stamatia GiannarouHamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Mathias WinklerImperial Prostate, Division of Surgery, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Funding

John Black Charitable FoundationResearch for Patient Benefit ProgrammeRosetrees TrustUrology FoundationWellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo develop and validate a deep learning model for interpretation of fluorescence confocal microscopy (FCM) images for intraoperative surgical margin assessment during radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND

methodsFluorescence confocal microscopy images from the multicentre Imperial Prostate 8-Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy for Rapid Evaluation of Surgical Cancer Excision (IP8-FLUORESCE) study were used to train and test a convolutional neural network model. The modified model incorporated focal loss with label smoothing, dropout regularisation, adaptive class weighting, and weighted sampling to address pronounced class imbalance. Images were pre-processed by extracting regions of interest at a defined digital zoom level and normalised to 896 × 896 pixels. The reference standard was surgical margin status on conventional histopathology assessed by an expert histopathologist. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration via Brier scores. External validation was conducted using an independent dataset from the LaserSAFE feasibility trial. Model explainability was evaluated using Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) and a custom graphical user interface (GUI) was developed to support real-time deployment.

resultsA total of 275 images (37 tumour and 238 benign from 24 patients) were included for model development and internal testing. On the internal test set (n = 57), the model achieved a sensitivity of 87.5%, specificity of 97.9%, and an AUC of 0.93, with good calibration (Brier score 0.16). External validation using 46 independent images yielded a sensitivity of 91.3%, specificity of 73.9%, and an AUC of 0.83, with acceptable calibration (Brier score 0.20). Grad-CAM visualisations aligned with malignant structures on FCM images, and the GUI enabled rapid, interpretable predictions in <2 s.

conclusionsWe developed and validated a deep learning model for interpretation of FCM images from RP specimens, which demonstrated strong discriminative performance and generalisability for automated FCM interpretation. This approach represents a scalable solution for real-time intraoperative margin assessment and may reduce reliance on intraoperative pathology support.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansMaleMargins of ExcisionMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Fluorescenceartificial intelligencedeep learningfluorescence confocal microscopyintraoperative margin analysispositive surgical marginsprostate cancerradical prostatectomyrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID42001901
PMCPMC13314556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.