ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2026
Large-scale analysis of FMR1 CGG repeat length and risk of premature ovarian insufficiency in over 92 000 women.
Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chromosomal and genetic causes of primary ovarian insufficiency in the Utah population.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
study questionDoes FMR1 repeat length confer clinically meaningful predictive value for premature ovarian insufficiency (POI)? SUMMARY ANSWER: FMR1 repeat length increases POI risk from ∼36 repeats onward but has limited diagnostic utility compared with a polygenic score for menopause timing. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: FMR1 premutation carriers (≥55 repeats) are reported to have high risk of Fragile-X Associated Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (FXPOI), but prior studies were small and highly ascertained. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Cross-sectional analysis of ∼92 000 women from the UK Biobank with genetic and health data. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
methodsFemale UK Biobank participants were genotyped for FMR1 repeat length. Associations with self-reported POI, age at menopause, and other reproductive phenotypes were analysed in women. FMR1 protein levels were measured, and genome-wide analyses were conducted to identify potential genetic modifiers. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Of 518 female premutation carriers with available age at natural menopause, only 6.9% reported POI. Elevated POI risk was observed starting at 36 repeats, increasing continuously with repeat length, but no threshold showed strong predictive power (maximum AUC 0.60 vs AUC 0.64 for polygenic score). No association was found between repeat length and FMR1 protein levels, consistent with an RNA gain-of-function toxicity mechanism. RAD52 was identified as a potential genetic modifier. LARGE SCALE DATA: UK Biobank resource (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: POI was self-reported rather than clinically confirmed. Analyses could not assess AGG interruptions, mosaicism, or X-inactivation. Genetic modifiers require replication. Findings are limited to a single population dataset. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsThese results challenge the utility of the FXPOI disease category, suggest limited diagnostic value of clinical FMR1 premutation testing for POI, and highlight alternative mechanisms and potential modifiers such as RAD52. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This work was conducted using the UK Biobank resource (application 9905). This work was funded by the Medical Research Council (unit programs: MC_UU_12015/2, MC_UU_00006/2) and Wellcome (Discovery award 302536/Z/23/Z). The sponsors had no role in the study design, collection, analysis, or interpretation of the data, the writing of the manuscript or the decision to submit it for publication. J.R.B.P. and A.M. have engaged in paid consultancy for Ovartix Ltd. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.