ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Penalized Estimation in Finite Mixtures of Multivariate Regression Models via the EM-PGM Algorithm.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In many areas of medical and life sciences research, multiple diagnostic criteria and phenotypic outcomes are assessed simultaneously to characterize diseases and biological traits. These multivariate outcomes are often associated with high-dimensional covariates and subject to underlying population heterogeneity, presenting challenges for analysis and interpretation. To address these issues, we study a finite mixture of multivariate regression models (mvFMR), which jointly models multiple outcomes while capturing latent subgroup structure. By accounting for both outcome multiplicity and data heterogeneity, mvFMR improves predictive performance and enhances interpretability for multivariate outcomes in complex datasets. We adopt a penalized maximum likelihood approach to estimate mvFMR, which enables scalability and variable selection in high-dimensional settings. We further develop the EM-PGM algorithm, an efficient estimation procedure that combines the expectation-maximization (EM) framework with the proximal gradient method (PGM) to handle high-dimensionality and the non-differentiability of the penalty function. Simulation studies demonstrate that mvFMR with EM-PGM outperforms alternative methods in terms of estimation accuracy, sparsity recovery, and computational efficiency. Applications to analyses of diabetes diagnosis data and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia data illustrate the practical utility of our penalized mvFMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.