ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2026
Integrating traditional practices, livelihoods, and conservation with Indigenous-led furbearer camera trapping.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating traditional practices, livelihoods, and conservation with Indigenous-led furbearer camera trapping.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Contemporary conservation goals have a greater chance of success when practitioners collaborate with Indigenous communities. The importance of such collaborations has spurred calls by Western and Indigenous researchers to engage in equitable coproduction of ecological research that integrates multiple ways of knowing. However, Indigenous-led conservation research is exceedingly rare. We conducted a case study, applicable globally, in which an Indigenous community experiencing intense industrial resource extraction used Indigenous knowledge and Western science to examine the impacts on species highly valued by the community, namely, furbearing mesocarnivores. Unique knowledge offered by elders and the community suggested rapid declines in many formerly abundant species. Together, we used camera trapping and statistical modeling to investigate the relative abundance of and response to disturbance in lynx (Lynx canadensis), red fox (Vulpes vulpes), marten (Martes americana), and fisher (Pekania pennanti) in north-central Alberta. Low species abundance presented analytical challenges, necessitating pooling species. Several industrial features were associated with (small) increased relative abundance of furbearers (β range 0.12 to 0.30), whereas several others were associated with negative abundance of furbearers (β range -0.25 to -0.64). As Indigenous communities globally face such industrial pressures, we illustrate how Indigenous-led research design, hypotheses, data collection, and interpretation, coupled with statistical ecological data analysis, can inform pressing conservation decisions. Indigenous Peoples face ongoing challenges accessing essential traditional resources because declining ecosystem functioning is directly linked to Indigenous well-being. Overall, successful conservation and stewardship are often best achieved through such Indigenous-led partnerships that address the joint goals of Indigenous livelihoods and conservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.