ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
A usability-driven workflow for virtual fracture reduction using an open platform with ICP.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeVirtual surgical planning can support fracture reduction, but its routine use remains limited by the time and interaction burden associated with manually manipulating fragments in six degrees of freedom. This work presents a CBCT-based workflow designed to minimise user interaction by replacing continuous manual manipulation with a small number of point-based initialisation steps.
methodsFragment alignment through a sequential rigid registration strategy based on the iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. The largest fragment is initialised manually. Subsequent fragments inherit the transformation estimated in the previous step and are refined automatically through ICP, although additional initialisation may be required in unfavourable configurations. Reduction accuracy was assessed using surface-to-surface distance analysis. The workflow is implemented using fully open-source tools ensuring reproducibility and accessibility without proprietary dependencies.
resultsThe workflow was evaluated on experimentally induced bovine femur fractures comprising two to four fragments by users with heterogeneous backgrounds. Compared to manual alignment, the proposed approach significantly reduced reduction time (Wilcoxon signed-rank paired test, p = 0.022), corresponding to an average reduction of approximately 63%. Surface-to-surface analysis showed mean alignment errors of approximately 1.5-1.8 mm, with consistent results across users.
conclusionA usability-driven workflow that constrains interaction to a limited number of discrete steps can substantially improve the efficiency of virtual fracture reduction while maintaining user control. The open-source pipeline provides an accessible solution for preoperative fracture reduction planning and should be regarded as a foundation for further developments in usability-driven virtual fracture reduction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42001366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.