ArticleNursing open2026
Exploring the Perception of Urinary Catheter Use in Older Surgical Patients: ADLs Matter.
Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis study aims to assess the perception of urinary catheter use in older patients undergoing urologic and orthopaedic surgery and to explore the associated factors, specifically functional independence and knowledge.
designA cross-sectional research design.
methodsPatients were eligible if they were aged 65 and older, had received urological or orthopaedic surgery, were able to communicate independently, and had a urinary catheter. Data collection included demographics, voiding function history, health conditions, and the knowledge and perception of urinary catheter use. Multiple regression analysis was employed to investigate the variables associated with the perception of urinary catheter use.
resultsA total of 204 older patients were enrolled. The mean score of perception was 41.8 ± 2.7 (range 13-65). Lower perception scores (indicating a preference for catheterization) were observed for items related to mobility difficulties and incontinence. Multiple regression analysis revealed that older patients with greater independence in activities of daily living (ADLs) and better knowledge were significantly more likely to have a positive perception (i.e., recognizing the benefits of catheter removal and its risks).
conclusionOlder surgical patients' perceptions of urinary catheter use are significantly shaped by their ADL status and knowledge levels. Although catheters are often viewed as a convenience for mobility and incontinence, such perceptions frequently misalign with evidence-based safety standards. To optimize perioperative care, it is imperative to implement structured preoperative education and shared decision-making frameworks that prioritize function-based urinary management. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: This study incorporates older patients' perspectives by assessing their perceptions and knowledge of catheterization. The findings advocate for a transition toward function-based management, where catheter alternatives are tailored to individual ADL status. By aligning clinical practice with patients' functional needs and informed preferences, healthcare providers can empower patients and reduce the risk of iatrogenic harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.