Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42001227›Full record

ArticleNursing open2026

The Relationship Between Nurses' Spiritual Well-Being and Patient Privacy: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Serpil Su, Ayşe Kacaroğlu Vicdan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Serpil SuFaculty of Nursing, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9263-6046
Ayşe Kacaroğlu VicdanFaculty of Health Sciences, Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University, Muğla, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7486-9396

Funding

Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to examine the relationship between nurses' levels of spiritual well-being and their status of observing patient privacy.

designA descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted. METHODS AND DATA SOURCE: The sample comprised 199 nurses working in a university hospital. The study data were collected between 1 January and 28 February 2022, using a Descriptive Characteristics Form, the Spiritual Well-Being Scale and the Patient Privacy Scale in Nursing. Ethics committee approval was obtained from a state university's Scientific Research Ethics Committee.

resultsIt was determined that the nurses' spiritual well-being levels were above the medium level, and the patient's privacy was high. A statistically significant positive relationship exists between the Spiritual Well-Being Scale and Patient Privacy Scale in Nursing scores. The regression model for the total scale showed an R

conclusionIt has been determined that as nurses' spiritual well-being increases, they pay more attention to patient privacy. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NURSING PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: This study contributes to the nurses' understanding of the importance of spiritual values in patient privacy and to pay attention to this issue in patient care. IMPACT: In this study addressing patient privacy, it was found that nurses' spiritual well-being is related to patient privacy. The conclusions impact future patients, nurses and managers. REPORTING

methodThe study was compliant with the STROBE checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Indexed as

Nursing Staff, HospitalPrivacySpiritualityAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesnursenursing carepatient privacyspiritualityspiritual well‐being

Identifiers

PMID42001227
PMCPMC13091915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.