Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42001183›Full record

ReviewJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026

Current treatment strategies and prospects for chest wall defect repair and reconstruction.

Lei Wang, Xianfeng Shao, Guangjian Li, Guangqiang Zhao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lei Wang *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital/ Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, No.519, Kunzhou Rd, Kunming, 650106, Yunnan, China.
Xianfeng Shao *Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital/ Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, No.519, Kunzhou Rd, Kunming, 650106, Yunnan, China.
Guangjian LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital/ Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, No.519, Kunzhou Rd, Kunming, 650106, Yunnan, China. Ligj778402401@163.com.
Guangqiang ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University/Yunnan Cancer Hospital/ Peking University Cancer Hospital Yunnan, No.519, Kunzhou Rd, Kunming, 650106, Yunnan, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82360490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chest wall defect is relatively uncommon in clinical practice, however, their etiologies are diverse. Particularly in cases involving large defect, the absence of effective repair and reconstruction can result in a series of pathological changes, including softening of the chest wall and respiratory abnormalities.The outcomes of chest wall reconstruction surgery are influenced by numerous factors, with surgical technique, specific methods, and chosen materials being critical components. As our understanding of chest wall defect deepens, coupled with ongoing advancements in reconstructive surgical techniques and the innovation of new reconstruction materials, the repair of many previously unmanageable chest wall defect has become feasible. This review aims to analyze the current literature on this topic and to select several representative strategies for chest wall defect reconstruction for detailed discussion.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresThoracic WallHumansSurgical FlapsArtificial materialAutologous tissue flapChest wall defectRepair and reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID42001183
PMCPMC13231528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.