ReviewExperimental hematology & oncology2026
Metabolic drivers of genome instability in cancer: mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities.
Review in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative single-cell and spatial transcriptomic analyses identify LMX1B as a tumor suppressor orchestrating the GDF15-ATP4B axis in renal cell carcinoma.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Regulatory Roles of Kaempferol on the PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway and Associated MicroRNAs in Different Cancer Types.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Targeting mitochondria as a potential therapeutic strategy against radioresistance in cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Preoperative immunonutrition as a strategy for reducing oxidative stress and inflammation in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metabolic reprogramming and genome instability represent two fundamental hallmarks of cancer. Emerging studies now demonstrate that specific metabolic alterations directly fuel replication stress, DNA damage, and compromised DNA damage response. This underscores that metabolites are not merely passive by-products but active biochemical regulators of genome instability. Perturbation of specific metabolic pathways can preferentially unmask these vulnerabilities for therapeutic targeting. In this review, we propose an integrated framework highlighting metabolism-induced genome instability as a potential therapeutic target. By delineating the metabolic targets that induce genome instability, we provide a comprehensive overview of the complex interplay between metabolic pathways and genome stability. We further highlight that metabolism-induced genome instability can be strategically exploited to potentiate standard-of-care therapies. Collectively, these insights redefine metabolism-induced genome instability as a targetable vulnerability of cancer. This systematic synthesis provides a mechanistic rationale for next-generation therapeutic designs in which metabolic interventions are leveraged to convert genome instability into actionable clinical vulnerabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.