Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42001160›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2026

Long-term efficacy of fluralaner (Exzolt

Luanderson Cardoso Pereira, Nathalie de Sena Pereira, Denis Dantas da Silva, Kivia Millana de Sousa, Clarice de Freitas Bezerra, Jéssica Martins Sanches, Lívia Fagundes Viana Bosnic, Luiz Gustavo Rodrigues Oliveira, Carlos Ramon do Nascimento Brito, Nelder Figueiredo Gontijo and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Luanderson Cardoso PereiraGraduate Program in Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Nathalie de Sena PereiraGraduate Program in Parasite Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Denis Dantas da SilvaGraduate Program in Parasite Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Kivia Millana de SousaDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Clarice de Freitas BezerraDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Jéssica Martins SanchesGraduate Program in Parasite Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Lívia Fagundes Viana BosnicDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Luiz Gustavo Rodrigues OliveiraCenter for Biological and Health Sciences, Federal University of Oeste da Bahia, Barreiras, Bahia, Brazil.
Carlos Ramon do Nascimento BritoDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Nelder Figueiredo GontijoDepartment of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Andressa Noronha Barbosa da SilvaGraduate Program in Parasite Biology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Antonia Claudia Jácome da CâmaraDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Lúcia Maria da Cunha GalvãoDepartment of Clinical and Toxicological Analyses, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Manuela Sales Lima NascimentoDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil.
Gabriel L HamerDepartment of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA.
Cleber GalvãoInstituto Oswaldo Cruz-FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rita de Cássia Moreira de SouzaGrupo Triatomíneos, Instituto René-Rachou-FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Marcos Horácio PereiraDepartment of Parasitology, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Paulo Marcos Matta GuedesDepartment of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil. paulo.guedes@ufrn.br.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 403598/2023-0Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior The Article Processing Charge (APC) for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Brazil (CAPES) (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614). For open access purposes, the authors have applied a Creative Commons CC BY license to any accepted version of arcticrticle.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChagas disease control relies primarily on vector control using pyrethroid insecticide sprays with residual action in domestic and peridomestic environments. However, the necessity for repeated applications and the development of pyrethroid resistance in some countries have undermined this strategy. Alternative control tools are needed, and host-targeted systemic insecticides offer an alternative approach by creating toxic blood meals for hematophagous vectors. In peridomestic settings, chickens are major blood meal sources for triatomines. This study evaluated the insecticidal activity of orally administered fluralaner (Exzolt

methodsSixteen non-breeding chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) were randomized by weight into four groups: group 1, untreated control (n = 4); group 2, treated with two doses of 0.5 mg/kg fluralaner/Exzolt® (n = 4); group 3, treated with two doses of 2.5 mg/kg fluralaner/Exzolt® (n = 4); group 4, treated with two doses of 5.0 mg/kg fluralaner/Exzolt® (n = 4). To assess fluralaner (Exzolt®) efficacy, chickens were exposed to blood feeding by triatomines at baseline (day 0) and 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 56 and 77 days post-treatment. Mortality was monitored daily for up to 7 days after each feeding.

resultsTreatment with 0.5, 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg of Exzolt® resulted in 100% insecticidal activity in triatomines for up to 14, 21 and 28 days post-treatment, respectively. The 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg doses produced comparable insecticidal activity, both superior than that observed at 0.5 mg/kg.

conclusionsOral administration of fluralaner (Exzolt®) to chickens induces 100% insecticidal activity and maintains insecticidal efficacy against multiple triatomine species for up to 28 and 56 days post-treatment, respectively. These findings highlighting the potential of fluralaner as a complementary vector control strategy for Chagas disease in endemic areas.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseChickensInsecticidesInsect VectorsIsoxazolesPoultry DiseasesAdministration, OralAnimalsFemaleTriatomaA1443 compoundInsecticidesIsoxazolesChagas diseaseChickenFluralaner (Exzolt®)PanstrongylusRhodniusTriatoma

Identifiers

PMID42001160
PMCPMC13220561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.