Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42001150›Full record

Trial reportJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2026

Mind the gap: the temporal discrimination threshold of tactile sensation from implanted peripheral nerve stimulation.

John D Wright, Hamid Charkhkar, Emily L Graczyk

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04947462 (Proprioceptive Sensorimotor Integration With Neural Interfaces for Hand Prostheses), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04947462 narecruitingnot on this map

Proprioceptive Sensorimotor Integration With Neural Interfaces for Hand Prostheses

TypeinterventionalSponsorVA Office of Research and DevelopmentRan2021 to 2030Enrolled8ConditionsUpper Limb AmputeesArmsChronically Implanted Neural and Muscular Interface
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John D WrightDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Hamid CharkhkarDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA.
Emily L GraczykDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA. emily.graczyk@case.edu.

Funding

NIH HHS T32-EB004314-22U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs #I01 RX003699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ability to reliably detect the temporal order, overlap, and gaps between multiple tactile stimuli is crucial for making sense of our haptic interactions with complex environments. One important property of temporal processing of touch is the temporal discrimination threshold (TDT), which measures the shortest gap between two sequential stimuli required for them to be perceived as separate events. While the temporal properties of natural somatosensation are well understood, much less is known about the temporal properties of sensation elicited by peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) delivered via implanted neural interfaces. Improving our understanding of the TDT of PNS-evoked sensations is crucial for the development of effective neuroprostheses.

methodsThis study was conducted with two individuals with unilateral upper limb loss implanted with 16-contact extraneural electrodes around the median, ulnar, and/or radial nerves. To measure TDT, we used an ascending staircase paradigm commonly used for clinical assessment of TDT. We investigated the effects of stimulation intensity, pulse train duration, and frequency on the TDT for five electrode contacts in total across the participants.

resultsWe found that the TDT significantly decreased with increasing stimulation intensity and frequency. We also found that the TDT of PNS pulse trains was significantly lower than the TDT of individual pulses. However, the duration of the stimulation pulse train did not have a consistent effect on TDT. For both participants, TDT values for implanted PNS were comparable to the values previously seen in the literature for electrocutaneous stimulation.

conclusionSince PNS intensity and frequency are routinely adjusted to shape sensory experiences in neuroprosthetic applications, our findings highlight the need for coordinated control of stimulation timing alongside modulation of other PNS parameters. This coordination is essential to enable accurate timing perception, which is critical for functional upper limb tasks, such as detecting object slippage, manipulating objects, and maintaining grasp force. Therefore, our results have important implications for optimizing the delivery of sensory feedback in neuroprosthetic systems. Trial registration: This study was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (#NCT04947462) on 06/23/2021.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalPeripheral NervesSensory ThresholdsTouchTouch PerceptionAdultElectric StimulationElectrodes, ImplantedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuro-prosthesisPeripheral Nerve StimulationSensory RestorationTiming

Identifiers

PMID42001150
PMCPMC13235127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.