Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42001137›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2026

Deep learning-based identification of visually similar foliar diseases in field-grown barley.

Sofia Martello, Nikita Genze, Dominik G Grimm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sofia MartelloBioinformatics, Technical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, 94315, Straubing, Germany.
Nikita GenzeBioinformatics, Technical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, 94315, Straubing, Germany.
Dominik G GrimmBioinformatics, Technical University of Munich, Campus Straubing for Biotechnology and Sustainability, 94315, Straubing, Germany. dominik.grimm@tum.de.

Funding

Bayerisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst KI-PLANET
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate segmentation of foliar diseases under field conditions is essential for large-scale phenotyping, as breeding programs rely on reliable severity estimates to identify genotypes with improved resistance. However, most deep learning approaches have been developed as pathogen-specific models, which limits scalability in field-grown barley where multiple diseases naturally co-occur and exhibit substantial visual similarity.

resultsWe evaluated whether a multiclass segmentation model can simultaneously detect and distinguish two fungal diseases of barley, Puccinia hordei and Ramularia collo-cygni, and compared its performance with two disease-specific binary models. Using 336 high-resolution leaf scans collected in the field with naturally occurring co-infections, the multiclass model achieved higher Dice scores for brown rust (0.59 vs 0.40; +47.5% relative improvement) and ramularia (0.60 vs 0.53; +13.2% relative improvement). It also captured a greater proportion of individual lesions across both classes. At the genotype level, the model-predicted disease area percentages were highly consistent with those from ground truth annotations ([Formula: see text]).

conclusionsA unified multiclass framework can more effectively segment visually similar foliar diseases than separate binary models, while simplifying the computational workflow. This provides a scalable basis for automated resistance assessment within breeding pipelines. Code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/grimmlab/BarleyDiseaseSegmentation, with Mendeley Data dataset DOI 10.17632/4ny92p2r8f.1.

Indexed as

BarleyComputer visionDeep learningDisease resistancePlant phenotypingSemantic segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42001137
PMCPMC13097865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.