ArticleJournal of cardiothoracic surgery2026
Global trends and hotspots of left ventricular assist device from 1963 to 2024: a bibliometric analysis.
Article in Journal of cardiothoracic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLeft ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have undergone significant evolution as a crucial intervention for severe heart failure. This study sought to delineate the developmental trajectory of LVAD research through bibliometric analysis, emphasizing key advancements, principal contributors, and evolutionary trends.
methodsA comprehensive bibliometric analysis was performed utilizing the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database, encompassing publications from 1963 to 2024 pertinent to LVADs. This search yielded a total of 9,552 articles published in English. Data visualization and analysis were executed using VOSviewer (version 1.6.20), CiteSpace (version 6.3.R1), and R 4.3.3.
resultsThe examination of the 9,552 publications revealed notable global collaboration and considerable growth in LVAD research from 1963 to 2024. The United States led contributions, followed by Germany and Japan. Columbia University emerged as the leading institution with strong international collaborative networks. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation and Circulation were identified as the most influential journals. Notable authors like Naka Y and Pagani FD stood out with high citation counts and collaborative networks. Keyword analysis indicated a shift from fundamental device functionality to more intricate themes, such as regenerative medicine and long-term patient management.
conclusionsThis bibliometric analysis of the LVAD domain underscores research progress, emerging hotspots, and major contributors. It serves as a significant reference for future advancements in LVAD technology and its clinical applications, while fostering improvements and innovations in the treatment of heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.