ArticleBMC medical education2026
Psychological readiness for AI in health professions education: the role of innovativeness and cognitive flexibility among Turkish students.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare systems, limited research has examined how individual and cognitive factors jointly shape health science students’ attitudes towards AI. This study aimed to investigate the relationships between students’ attitudes toward AI, individual innovativeness, and cognitive flexibility. A cross-sectional correlational design was employed with 1026 undergraduate students enrolled in health science programs at a public university in Türkiye. Data were analysed using correlational and hierarchical regression methods. The findings indicated that students’ attitudes toward AI were characterized by a balanced structure, reflecting both positive expectations and concerns. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that individual innovativeness was consistently associated with attitudes toward AI, whereas cognitive flexibility showed smaller and mixed effects across its subdimensions, with the control dimension exhibiting opposite associations with positive and negative attitudes. In addition, technological curiosity, frequency of AI use, and support for AI course inclusion were significant contextual factors associated with AI attitudes. Overall, the findings suggest that students’ attitudes toward AI are shaped not only by knowledge but also by individual and cognitive characteristics. The study contributes to the literature by proposing an integrated psychological framework explaining AI readiness in health professions education. From a practical perspective, the results highlight the importance of designing AI-integrated curricula that address individual differences while fostering adaptive expertise, critical thinking, and reflective engagement with AI technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.