ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Nasal Airway Respiration Anti-tic (NARA) method in pediatric Tourette syndrome: a retrospective case series.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTourette syndrome (TS) often impairs social and academic functioning in children due to disruptive motor and vocal tics. Minimally invasive and patient-driven interventions are desirable, yet existing treatments do not always provide rapid or sustained relief. This study evaluates the clinical outcomes of the Nasal Airway Respiration Anti-tic (NARA) method—a non-invasive, lip-closed nasal breathing technique—for children with TS.
methodsIn this uncontrolled retrospective case series, we identified all 8 consecutive pediatric patients (5 boys, 3 girls; ages 6–10) meeting DSM-5 criteria for TS who presented with habitual mouth breathing between 2019 and 2021. All patients were free of tic-suppressing medications at baseline. Patients had a chronic disease course (mean duration of illness: 2.5 years). No eligible patients were excluded. Patients were instructed to practice the NARA method (3–5 s nasal inhalation, 2s breath-holding, and 6–10 s exhalation with firm lip closure) for 2 min, 3 times daily. Tic severity was assessed using the Yale Global Tic Severity Scale (YGTSS) and a modified Rush Video Rating Scale (mRVRS) at baseline and follow-up (mean 18.4 months).
resultsAt the initial visit, a 120-second trial of the NARA method significantly reduced tic frequency (p = 0.038) and severity (p = 0.025). Long-term follow-up demonstrated notable improvements in YGTSS motor and vocal subscales (14.4 ± 1.7 to 2.4 ± 1.2; 13.6 ± 2.3 to 3.6 ± 1.3, respectively). Three children who had refused school attendance due to severe tics returned to regular classes. Crucially, video analysis confirmed a “carry-over effect,” showing sustained tic reduction even during natural, resting respiration (without the maneuver) at the final assessment.
conclusionsThe NARA method was associated with substantial tic reduction in this small cohort. We hypothesize that the intense physiological sensory input from nasal respiration may function as a “primary reward” that activates the thalamic centromedian nucleus to overshadow the urge-to-tic cycle. Clinically, the method’s success relied on active parental support. While placebo effects cannot be entirely ruled out in this uncontrolled study, the immediate “On/Off” reversibility of tics upon lip release implies a specific physiological antagonism distinct from simple distraction. Future prospective controlled trials are warranted to validate these preliminary findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.