ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Development of machine learning models for preoperative prediction of insufficient clinical improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying patients who are unlikely to achieve significant improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) facilitates more effective perioperative shared decision-making (SDM). This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for the preoperative prediction of insufficient clinical improvement 1 year after ACLR using the Lysholm Knee Score Scale, and to evaluate important predictive variables.
methodsA single-center retrospective study design was adopted. A total of 892 patients who underwent primary ACLR and completed at least 1 year of complete follow-up in the Department of Orthopedics of a tertiary hospital between January 2014 and December 2024 were enrolled. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Lysholm score for the study population was determined to be 8.5 points using an anchoring method combined with an effect size method. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using 5‑fold stratified cross‑validation combined with grid search. Five models, namely ExtraTrees, random forest (RF), XGBoost, logistic regression (LR), and K‑nearest neighbors (KNN), were evaluated and interpreted using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis.
resultsAmong the five models, the ExtraTrees model achieved the best performance, with a validation set AUC of 0.887 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.852–0.917), a sensitivity of 0.719, a specificity of 0.838, and a Brier score of 0.091. DCA showed that the ExtraTrees model yielded the highest net clinical benefit over a wide range of threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis revealed that bilateral meniscal injury was the most important predictor of insufficient improvement, followed by higher preoperative baseline Lysholm score, grade III–IV chondral injury, lateral meniscal injury, smoking history, and hypertension.
conclusionBased on the Lysholm score, machine learning models perform well in the preoperative prediction of insufficient clinical improvement 1 year after ACLR. The ExtraTrees model is promising for assisting perioperative shared decision‑making and personalized patient management for ACLR by preoperatively identifying approximately 71.9% of patients at risk of insufficient clinical improvement and providing explanations for relevant contributing factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.