Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42001062›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Development of machine learning models for preoperative prediction of insufficient clinical improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Huan Wang, Hujun Wang, Nan Li, Shuyan Qie, Jie Dong, Hanming Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Huan Wang *Department of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100144, China.
Hujun Wang *Department of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100144, China.
Nan LiDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100144, China.
Shuyan QieDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100144, China.
Jie DongDepartment of the Second Orthopaedics Rehabilitation Centre, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100144, China.
Hanming WangDepartment of Rehabilitation, Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100144, China. wanghanming666@163.com.

Funding

Beijing Rehabilitation Hospital Intramural Project Fund 2025-007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying patients who are unlikely to achieve significant improvement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) facilitates more effective perioperative shared decision-making (SDM). This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for the preoperative prediction of insufficient clinical improvement 1 year after ACLR using the Lysholm Knee Score Scale, and to evaluate important predictive variables.

methodsA single-center retrospective study design was adopted. A total of 892 patients who underwent primary ACLR and completed at least 1 year of complete follow-up in the Department of Orthopedics of a tertiary hospital between January 2014 and December 2024 were enrolled. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Lysholm score for the study population was determined to be 8.5 points using an anchoring method combined with an effect size method. Hyperparameter tuning was performed using 5‑fold stratified cross‑validation combined with grid search. Five models, namely ExtraTrees, random forest (RF), XGBoost, logistic regression (LR), and K‑nearest neighbors (KNN), were evaluated and interpreted using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis.

resultsAmong the five models, the ExtraTrees model achieved the best performance, with a validation set AUC of 0.887 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.852–0.917), a sensitivity of 0.719, a specificity of 0.838, and a Brier score of 0.091. DCA showed that the ExtraTrees model yielded the highest net clinical benefit over a wide range of threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis revealed that bilateral meniscal injury was the most important predictor of insufficient improvement, followed by higher preoperative baseline Lysholm score, grade III–IV chondral injury, lateral meniscal injury, smoking history, and hypertension.

conclusionBased on the Lysholm score, machine learning models perform well in the preoperative prediction of insufficient clinical improvement 1 year after ACLR. The ExtraTrees model is promising for assisting perioperative shared decision‑making and personalized patient management for ACLR by preoperatively identifying approximately 71.9% of patients at risk of insufficient clinical improvement and providing explanations for relevant contributing factors.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionMachine LearningAdultBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClassification AlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMinimal Clinically Important DifferencePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesROC CurveTreatment OutcomeAnterior cruciate ligament reconstructionMachine learningMinimal clinically important differencePreoperative prediction

Identifiers

PMID42001062
PMCPMC13220441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.