ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Physiotherapy in Nigerian emergency departments: a national survey of physiotherapists' perceptions of practice.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysiotherapy in emergency departments (EDs) is expanding globally, improving patients' access and outcomes. Although present in Sub-Saharan African countries like Nigeria, there is limited evidence on awareness or specific practices. In addition, there is limited evidence on physiotherapists' perceptions of these services, despite the importance of such perspectives in understanding their knowledge, engagement and potential contributions to effective physiotherapy service delivery within EDs in Nigeria. STUDY
aimTo explore and understand physiotherapists' perceptions of ED practice in Nigeria, within the context of their knowledge and professional experience.
methodsBetween March and August 2024, a nationwide survey was carried out among licensed physiotherapist clinicians domiciled in Nigeria across all geopolitical zones, with any level of experience in ED settings, to assess their knowledge and practice. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square tests assess healthcare setting and regional differences in practice. Alpha level was fixed at 0.05.
resultsA total of 108 physiotherapists from six Nigerian regions participated in the survey, with 65% based in tertiary healthcare facilities. Of the eight items assessing knowledge, 48% disagreed that clear ED physiotherapy guidelines exist. In terms of practice, 69% operate under a secondary contact model, and 51% used referrals to schedule ED physiotherapy. Significant differences were found across healthcare settings and specific payment methods (p < 0.001), with a higher percentage of participants from the teaching hospitals reporting out-of-pocket payments (73%).
conclusionThis study demonstrates that secondary contact physiotherapy services are perceived to be predominantly provided in Nigerian EDs, typically accessed via referrals, with patients primarily paying out-of-pocket. These findings highlight gaps that may affect the integration, delivery, and utilisation of physiotherapy services within the ED setting in Nigeria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.