ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Comprehensive geriatric assessment measures and subsequent EMS-transported emergency department use in adults aged ≥ 80 years: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency Medical Services (EMS) ambulance transport is a common route of emergency department (ED) arrival for adults aged ≥ 80 years, but factors associated with future EMS-transported ED presentation remain uncertain. We assessed whether baseline comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) measures were associated with EMS-transported ED presentation within 12 months.
methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study in Türkiye linking the Healthy Aging Center (YAŞAM) CGA registry, which records routine multidomain geriatric assessments in community-dwelling older adults, to ED administrative records from a tertiary hospital. Consecutive adults aged ≥ 80 years who underwent baseline CGA between October 5, 2023 and December 10, 2024 were included (n = 587). The primary outcome was ≥ 1 EMS-transported ED presentation within 12 months; repeat use (≥ 2 presentations) was a prespecified secondary outcome. Separate age- and sex-adjusted domain-specific association logistic regression models were fitted for each CGA measure; exploratory age- and sex-adjusted logistic models were also used for repeat use. Discrimination was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Cause-specific Cox models were used as sensitivity analyses for time to first EMS-transported ED presentation, censoring at death before any EMS event.
resultsDuring follow-up, 159/587 participants (27.1%) had ≥ 1 EMS-transported ED presentation, 55/587 (9.4%) had repeat use, and 51/587 (8.7%) died. Higher frailty was associated with the primary outcome (odds ratio [OR] per 1-point increase, 1.30; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16–1.47), whereas higher Katz Activities of Daily Living scores (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.70–0.85), Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form scores (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80–0.92), and Timed Up and Go indicator = 1 (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.23–0.50) were associated with lower odds. Discrimination was modest across models (AUC, 0.575–0.643). Cause-specific Cox sensitivity analyses showed directionally similar associations.
conclusionsIn adults aged ≥ 80 years, multiple routinely collected CGA domains were associated with subsequent EMS-transported ED use. These measures should be interpreted as indicators of geriatric vulnerability rather than stand-alone predictive tools; any predictive application would require externally validated multivariable models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.