ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Development and validation of fat-corrected virtual MR elastography to assess fibrosis stage in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Based Virtual MR Elastography of the Liver: Beyond Mechanical Waves.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate a fat-corrected virtual magnetic resonance elastography (FC-vMRE) framework based on diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to assess liver fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 463 MASLD patients underwent multi-b-values (0-1500 s/mm²) DWI acquisition, proton density fat fraction (PDFF), and conventional magnetic resonance elastography (MRE). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) parameters were calculated with or without fat correction (based on PDFF). Using the training cohort (n = 361), ADC-to-MRE formulas were derived to compute virtual MRE (vMRE) and FC-vMRE. In the validation cohort (n = 102, with biopsy), the diagnostic performance of vMRE, FC-vMRE, and MRE for fibrosis staging was compared.
resultsADC
conclusionFC-vMRE provides a clinically promising alternative requiring only standard MRI equipment, effectively correcting for fat-related confounding in MASLD, and demonstrating encouraging diagnostic concordance with MRE and histology. This approach shows potential for broader clinical implementation. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Fat-corrected virtual MRE using diffusion-weighted imaging provides promising fibrosis staging accuracy to conventional magnetic resonance elastography in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease patients without requiring specialized hardware. KEY POINTS: Fat infiltration confounds diffusion measurements in metabolic steatotic liver disease. Fat-corrected virtual MRE showed superior agreement with standard MRE. Hardware-free fibrosis assessment enables accessible liver stiffness measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.