ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
3D Segmentation of Multi-contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonances With Topological Correction and Synthetic Data Augmentation.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- In silico assessment of arrhythmic risk following the implantation of engineered heart tissues in porcine hearts with varying infarct locations.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Integrated multi-modal data analysis for computational modeling of healthy and location-dependent myocardial infarction conditions in porcine hearts.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAutomatic segmentation of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images improves the evaluation of heart structure and function, helping clinical diagnosis and the generation of in silico models. Recent advances have introduced synthetic augmentation (SA) using generative adversarial networks (GANs) and topological correction (TC) via persistent homology to enhance segmentation with convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, their combined effectiveness remains unexplored. Here, we extend and systematically evaluate these techniques, individually and in combination, for the first time in the context of three-dimensional (3D) CMR segmentation across challenging multi-vendor, multi-center, multi-class, and multi-contrast data sets.
methodsData involved anisotropic, topologically inconsistent cine and late gadolinium-enhanced (LGE) CMRs, and isotropic, topologically consistent ex vivo CMRs. Topological priors were defined in each data set from ground truth label (GTL) assessments, and TC was applied by retraining the baseline 3D CNN with a loss function accounting for topological discrepancies. For SA, deformed GTLs were used to generate synthetic images using trained 3D GANs.
resultsConsistent segmentation improvements were observed for the ex vivo data in both overlap with GTLs and topological precision when applying TC and SA individually and in combination. Notably, an enhanced identification of the infarction was obtained when SA and TC were used in the LGE data. Overall, SA increased the predictions overlap with GTLs, while TC reduced the topological discrepancies across all data sets.
conclusionTC and SA demonstrate strong potential for improving 3D CMR segmentation on complex, real-world data sets, especially when topologically consistent data are available for training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42000982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.