ArticleScientific reports2026
A segmented model for automobile appearance detection based on improved YOLOv11-seg.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional models encounter challenges in detecting vehicle appearance components in intricate settings because of their limited small-target recognition capability and suboptimal fusion of multi-scale features. To address these issues, we propose an enhanced vehicle appearance segmentation model based on the YOLOv11-seg framework. Central to our approach is the MCALayerPlus module, designed to concurrently process targets across a wide range of scales. By executing multi-scale feature extraction, the model effectively suppresses false detections arising from cluttered backgrounds. Furthermore, we incorporate an improved ShapeIoU loss function, which integrates a size-sensitivity factor and a category-aware shape penalty term. This integration sharpens shape-matching precision, captures nuanced feature representations, and accelerates model convergence. Experimental results on a specialized automotive dataset demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, achieving a mean Average Precision (mAP@0.5) of 94.09%, an mAP@0.5:0.95 of 77.12%, precision of 91.31%, and recall of 90.75%. Notably, the model maintains a lightweight profile (5.75 MB), ensuring high-speed inference (45.3 FPS) suitable for real-time deployment in intelligent transportation systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.