Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42000902›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A federated learning framework for deep imputation of missing data in heterogeneous ICU time series.

Raja Vavekanand, Anwar Ali Sathio, Mujtaba Sultani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Raja VavekanandDepartment of Information Technology, Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University Lyari, Karachi, 75660, Pakistan.
Anwar Ali SathioDepartment of Information Technology, Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University Lyari, Karachi, 75660, Pakistan.
Mujtaba SultaniFaculty of Computer Science, Kabul Polytechnic University (KPU), Kabul, Afghanistan. mujtaba.cs01@kpu.edu.af.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The proliferation of multimodal time-series healthcare data presents unprecedented opportunities for data-driven insights but also significant challenges due to pervasive missing values, especially in critical care environments. Traditional centralised imputation methods are often infeasible due to strict privacy regulations, while single-institution models suffer from poor generalizability. Federated learning offers a promising alternative but faces challenges, including statistical heterogeneity, temporal misalignment, and complex missingness patterns. This paper proposes Fed-HealthImp, a federated learning framework for deep imputation of missing values in multivariate, irregularly sampled clinical time-series. Our framework employs a self-attention-based imputation model with adaptive client weighting to handle non-IID data distributions across hospitals. We evaluate Fed-HealthImp on three real-world ICU datasets (eICU-CRD, MIMIC-IV, HiRID) under various missingness patterns. Results show that Fed-HealthImp achieves imputation quality within 3.5% of a privacy-violating centralised model, significantly outperforms local-only training, and improves downstream mortality prediction AUROC by up to 3.4%. Our work establishes a practical, privacy-preserving pathway for building robust imputation models from fragmented global ICU data.

Indexed as

Federated LearningIntensive Care UnitsAlgorithmsHumansAdaptive aggregationClinical predictionHealthcare data imputationHeterogeneous dataTime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID42000902
PMCPMC13254214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.