ArticleScientific reports2026
Favoring flat minima improves generalization of transfer-learned models for breast ultrasound tumor classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transfer learning with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for breast ultrasound tumor classification can be susceptible to overfitting and unstable generalization when training data are limited, noisy, and heterogeneous. Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) is an optimizer-level training strategy that encourages convergence to flatter regions of the loss landscape and may improve held-out performance without modifying model architecture. In this study, we systematically evaluated SAM for breast ultrasound image classification across seventeen CNN architectures spanning five families–VGG/AlexNet, ResNet, DenseNet, MobileNet, and EfficientNet–using four experiments on two datasets (BUSI and BUS-UCLM). We compared standard Adam versus SAM+Adam and standard stochastic gradient descent (SGD) versus SAM+SGD under matched experimental settings. On BUSI, SAM improved mean validation accuracy by +2.30 percentage points with Adam and by +2.51 percentage points with SGD. On BUS-UCLM, the corresponding mean gains were +2.27 and +2.55 percentage points. The largest individual improvement was observed for MobileNetV3 Small under SAM+SGD (+4.86 percentage points on BUSI), while the highest validation accuracy was achieved by VGG19 with SAM+SGD (96.20% on BUSI). Improvements were also observed in precision, recall, and F1-score, and paired statistical testing across architectures showed consistently positive effects with large effect sizes. Computational analysis showed moderate training-time overhead but no architectural inference overhead, supporting the practical feasibility of SAM. Overall, these findings indicate that SAM is a useful and broadly effective training enhancement for transfer-learned breast ultrasound classification across multiple CNN families and two independent datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.