ArticleCommunications medicine2026
Interactive multimodal disease risk evaluation using a self-service non-invasive device.
Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-communicable diseases such as diabetes, fatty liver disease and chronic kidney disease are major global health burdens that benefit from early-stage detection. However, standard diagnostic methods are often time-consuming and dependent on clinical infrastructure, limiting their applicability in routine or population-scale screening.
methodsWe develop an interactive multimodal disease risk evaluation system based on a self-service, non-invasive device that captures facial images, tongue images and pulse signals. A representation learning framework was employed to calculate cross-modal dependencies for disease prediction. Analyses were performed on a real-world cohort of 2,423 participants spanning nine common non-communicable diseases. Model performance was evaluated using 10 repeated train-test splits, and paired statistical tests were conducted to assess the significance of performance differences.
resultsHere we show that the system achieves a mean diagnostic accuracy of 92.64% across 10 repeated train-test splits. The interactive multimodal approach improves average performance by 3.39% compared with single-modality baselines, indicating that modeling cross-modal interactions enhances prediction. The importance of cross-modal patterns is analyzed, demonstrating that modalities contribute complementary diagnostic signals to improve the model's capability.
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that combining non-invasive sensing with interactive multimodal framework supports accessible and scalable disease risk evaluation, and establish iMES as a deployable solution for decentralized disease prevention in community and low-resource settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.