ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-year evaluation of silage yield, quality, and stability of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in the central Black Sea region of Türkiye.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Maize (Zea mays L.) is the dominant silage crop in intensive livestock systems because of its high biomass production and energy-rich, well-fermenting forage. Here, 16 silage maize genotypes were evaluated for four consecutive seasons (2017-2020) under the ecological conditions of Samsun, Türkiye, using a broad set of phenological, morphological, yield, and forage-quality traits (including fiber fractions and energy-based indices such as digestible/gross energy and estimated milk yield). Across years, substantial environmental variation affected several traits, highlighting the importance of multi-year testing for genotype assessment. Among the evaluated materials, TTM 2015-22 showed high fresh biomass productivity (67.1 t ha⁻
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.