A spherical fuzzy WASPAS approach with Dombi aggregation for satellite imagery tool selection in climate monitoring applications.

R Vinod Kumar, P Hemavathi, P Muralikrishna, Hasan Dincer, Serhat Yuksel

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

R Vinod KumarDepartment of Mathematics, Rajalakshmi Engineering College (Autonomous), Thandalam, Chennai, 602 105, India. vinodkumar.r@rajalakshmi.edu.in.

P HemavathiDepartment of Mathematics, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, SIMATS, Thandalam, 602 105, India.

P MuralikrishnaPG and Research Department of Mathematics, Muthurangam Government Arts College (Autonomous), Vellore, 632002, India.

Hasan DincerIstanbul Medipol University, School of Business, Kavacık South Campus, Beykoz, 34810, Istanbul, Turkey.

Serhat YukselIstanbul Medipol University, School of Business, Kavacık South Campus, Beykoz, 34810, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, a new decision-making model is suggested to be applied when choosing satellite imagery analysis tools in climatic monitoring uses. The method combines the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS) model with Dombi aggregation operators in the context of the spherical fuzzy set that is successfully used to address the uncertainty, hesitation and imprecision common in expert ratings. The criteria used to select the key decisions are the accuracy of the resolution, efficiency in time, the ability to integrate data, and the applicability in climate analysis. Spherical fuzzy sets improve the ability of the model to deal with vague information and the use of Dombi operators enables the aggregation behavior to be adjusted. The effectiveness and strength of the proposed method is confirmed and proven in a case study and comparative analysis. The findings point to its applicability as a valid and total strategy of technology choice in environmental as well as remote sensing arenas.

Indexed as

Climate monitoringDombi aggregation operatorMulti-criteria decision makingSatellite imagery analysisSpherical fuzzy setWASPAS method

Identifiers

PMID42000864

DOI10.1038/s41598-026-48877-6

PMCPMC13254142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.